COMPARATIVE FIELD PERFORMANCE OF SUBDRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Citation
Z. Ahmed et al., COMPARATIVE FIELD PERFORMANCE OF SUBDRAINAGE SYSTEMS, Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 123(3), 1997, pp. 194-201
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Water Resources","Engineering, Civil
ISSN journal
07339437
Volume
123
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
194 - 201
Database
ISI
SICI code
0733-9437(1997)123:3<194:CFPOSS>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Long-term pavement performance in wet climates is directly related to the amount, extent, and duration of internal moisture. Retention of mo isture in base/subbase layers can lead to damage and premature failure of the pavement structure. A positive subdrainage system can mitigate moisture retention. Two types of subdrainage collector systems are co mmonly used for removing subsurface moisture from pavement systems. Th ese are the conventional perforated pipe edge drains and the prefabric ated edge drains (PFEDs) or geotextile fin drains. Significant researc h was conducted in Indiana on in-place asphalt, concrete, and overlaid pavement sections incorporating these two types of subdrainage system s. Data collected from instrumented sites show varying response rates and time of outflow with respect to precipitation for pavement and col lector types. Pavement-shoulder joints were found to be the major sour ce of surface infiltration. Statistical analysis has shown significant influence of base permeability in addition to pavement and drain type s on outflow volumes.