The Hebbian view of word representation is challenged by findings of task (
level of processing)-dependent, event-related potential patterns that do no
t support the notion of a fixed set of neurons representing a given word. W
ith cross-language phonological reliability encoding more asymmetrical left
hemisphere activity is evoked than with word comprehension. Tills suggests
a dynamical view of the brain as a self-organizing, connective-adjusting s
ystem.