Bone modeling and cell-material interface responses induced by nickel-titanium shape memory alloy after periosteal implantation

Citation
J. Ryhanen et al., Bone modeling and cell-material interface responses induced by nickel-titanium shape memory alloy after periosteal implantation, BIOMATERIAL, 20(14), 1999, pp. 1309-1317
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary
Journal title
BIOMATERIALS
ISSN journal
01429612 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
14
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1309 - 1317
Database
ISI
SICI code
0142-9612(199907)20:14<1309:BMACIR>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the new bone formation, modeling and cell-material interface responses induced by nickel-titanium shape memo ry alloy after periosteal implantation. We used a regional acceleratory phe nomenon (RAP) model, in which a periosteal contact stimulus provokes an ada ptive modelling response. NiTi has thermal shape memory and superelasticity properties uncommon in other implant alloys. So far, there are insufficien t data concerning the biocompatibility of NiTi as a bone implant. NiTi was compared to stainless steel (stst) and Ti-6Al-4V. The test implant was plac ed in contact with the intact femur periosteum, but it was not fixed inside the bone. Histomorphometry with digital image analysis was used to determi ne the bone formation and resorption parameters. The ultrastructural featur es of cell-material adhesion were analysed with scanning electron microscop y (FESEM). A typical peri-implant bone wall modelation was seen due to the normal RAP. The maximum new woven bone formation started earlier (2 weeks) in the Ti-6Al-4V group than in the NiTi (P < 0.01) group, but also decrease d earlier, and at 8 weeks the NiTi(P < 0.05) and stst (P < 0.005) groups ha d greater cortical bone width. At 12 and 26 weeks no statistical difference s were seen in the histomorphometric values. The histological response of t he soft tissues around the NiTi implant was also clearly non-toxic and non- irritating. Cell adhesion and focal contacts were similar between the mater ials studied by FESEM. We conclude that NiTi had no negative effect on tota l new bone formation or normal RAP after periosteal implantation during a 2 6-week follow-up. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.