Bedside evaluation of efficient airway humidification during mechanical ventilation of the critically ill

Citation
Jd. Ricard et al., Bedside evaluation of efficient airway humidification during mechanical ventilation of the critically ill, CHEST, 115(6), 1999, pp. 1646-1652
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
CHEST
ISSN journal
00123692 → ACNP
Volume
115
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1646 - 1652
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3692(199906)115:6<1646:BEOEAH>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Study objective: To determine the correlation between simple rating of cond ensation seen in the flex-tube connecting the heating and humidifying devic e used with the endotracheal tube and hygrometric parameters (absolute and relative humidity and tracheal temperature) measured by psychrometry. Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial. Setting: Medical ICU of Louis Mourier Hospital, Colombes, France, a univers ity-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients: Forty-five consecutive mechanically ventilated critically ill pat ients, Interventions: Patients undergoing mechanical ventilation were randomly ass igned to receive humidification with one of the four heat and moisture exch angers (HMEs) tested or with a conventional heated humidifier. Measurements: The hygrometric performances of four HMEs (BB2215, BB50, and BB100 from Pall Biomedical, Saint-Germaine-en-Laye, France; and Hygrobac-Da r from Mallinekrodt, Mirandola, Italy) and a heated humidifier (Fisher & Pa ykel; Auckland, New Zealand) were studied after 3 h and also after 48 h of use for the Hygrobac-Dar and correlated to a clinical visual inspection rat ing the amount of condensation in the flex-tube of the endotracheal tube. Results: A total of 95 measurements in 45 patients were performed. The best hygrometric parameters were obtained with the heated humidifier (p < 0.001 ). The Hygrobac-Dar yielded significantly higher values for both humidities and tracheal temperature than the other three HMEs (p < 0.001). The perfor mance of Hygrobac-Dar was unchanged after 48 h of use. There was a signific ant correlation between the condensation seen in the flex-tube and the hygr ometric parameters measured by psychrometry (absolute humidity, rho = 0.7; relative humidity, rho = 0.7; tracheal temperature, rho = 0.5, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In mechanically ventilated ICU patients, visual evaluation of t he condensation in the flex-tube provides an estimation of the heating and humidifying efficacy of the heating and humidifying device used, thus allow ing the clinician bedside monitoring of airway humidification.