A. Michils et al., Relationship between allergic status and specificity of IgG antibody to inhaled allergens: the grass pollen model, CLIN EXP AL, 29(6), 1999, pp. 832-839
Background We have previously reported that IgG antibodies from healthy ind
ividuals and patients suffering from non-seasonal mite allergy bind to diff
erent sets of epitopes on Der p 1, allowing almost complete discrimination
of the populations.
Objectives To confirm this observation in a seasonal allergy model where a
clear relationship between allergic symptoms and exposure to the offending
agent is established. To investigate whether the pattern of modified specif
icity is related to the differences in IgG subclass hierarchy usually exhib
ited by nonallergic and allergic populations.
Methods The capacity of individual sera from patients allergic to grass pol
len and healthy individuals, including grass pollen-sensitized subjects, to
prevent the binding of pooled Igc, IgG1, and IgG4 fractions from grass pol
len-allergic patients and healthy individuals to solid-phase bound grass po
llen antigen was evaluated in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) usi
ng streptavidin-biotin technology. Specificity controls were pet-formed usi
ng sera from patients allergic to cat dander and house dust mite.
Results The capacity of sera to prevent the antigen binding of allergic IgG
averaged 84 +/- 5% for allergic sera and 53 +/- 6% for healthy sera (P<0.0
01 by one-way ANOVA). Conversely, using the antigen-binding capacity of hea
lthy control IgG as reference, percentage inhibitions averaged 46 +/- 9% in
grass pollen-allergic subjects compared with 80 +/- 4%, 82 +/- 2% in healt
hy individuals, and mite- and cat-allergic patients, respectively, resultin
g in two well-separated populations (P<0.0001 by one-way ANOVA). Similar re
sults were found regardless of whether pooled IgG1 or IgG4 were used.
Conclusion Together with previous data, our results define a new type of hu
moral signature in the immune response to inhaled allergens. Allergic and h
ealthy status differ not only in the presence or absence of specific IgE an
tibody but also in the preferential expression of distinct IgG specificitie
s that are better correlated with clinical manifestations and are unrelated
to subclass distribution.