Distal biceps ruptures - A followup of Boyd and Anderson repair

Citation
Ma. Karunakar et al., Distal biceps ruptures - A followup of Boyd and Anderson repair, CLIN ORTHOP, (363), 1999, pp. 100-107
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
ISSN journal
0009921X → ACNP
Issue
363
Year of publication
1999
Pages
100 - 107
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-921X(199906):363<100:DBR-AF>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Twenty-one distal biceps ruptures in 20 patients were treated during a 10-y ear period. All patients were men with an average age of 47 years (range, 3 7-70 years), Long term results (average, 44 months) were assessed using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder , and Hand outcomes questionnaire, isokinetic testing of elbow flexion and supination (strength and endurance), and patient satisfaction. Measurements of range of motion revealed diminished forearm rotation in four of 21 (19% ) elbows and diminished flexion in one of 21 (5%), Isokinetic testing revea led 10 of 21 (48%) elbows had weakness of supination versus three of 21 (14 %) for flexion, Deficits in endurance included eight of 21 (38%) elbows for supination and seven of 21 (33%) for flexion, Seven complications occurred in seven patients for a 35% complication rate. Heterotopic ossification wa s the most common complication, occurring in three patients. One of these p atients also had a synostosis. All patients completed the Disabilities of t he Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcomes questionnaire. Twelve patients had an e xcellent outcome, eight had a good outcome, and no patient had a fair or po or outcome. These results correlated closely with the patients' own subject ive assessments of their satisfaction with the procedure, Despite diminishe d strength and endurance and a high rate of complications, patient satisfac tion was excellent and functional outcome was good.