Comparison of the in vitro activity of and pathogen responses to sparfloxacin with those of other agents in the treatment of respiratory tract, urinary tract, and skin and skin-structure infections
M. Dowzicky et al., Comparison of the in vitro activity of and pathogen responses to sparfloxacin with those of other agents in the treatment of respiratory tract, urinary tract, and skin and skin-structure infections, CLIN THER, 21(5), 1999, pp. 790-805
The in vitro activity of and pathogen responses to sparfloxacin were compar
ed with those of standard therapies for the treatment of patients with comm
unity-acquired pneumonia, complicated skin or skin-structure infections, ur
inary tract infections, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis
, and acute maxillary sinusitis in 7 multicenter controlled trials in North
America. Sparfloxacin was administered orally as a 400-mg loading dose fol
lowed by 200 mg once daily for up to 10 days. The bacteriologic efficacy of
sparfloxacin (84% to 95%) was comparable to that of comparator drugs (77%
to 100%). Sparfloxacin was generally 2 to 8 times more active (minimum inhi
bitory concentration for 90% of strains tested [MIC90]: 0.03 to 0.5 mu g/mL
) than comparators against common pathogens isolated in community-acquired
infections, especially Streptococcus pneumoniae, including penicillin-resis
tant strains; Moraxella catarrhalis; Haemophilus influenzae; Streptococcus
pyogenes; and Staphylococcus aureus. Sparfloxacin was also effective agains
t Chlamydia and Mycoplasma species. The emergence of resistance was uncommo
n during sparfloxacin therapy (0.3% of 1100 cases). Higher area under the p
lasma concentration-time curve/MIC and maximum plasma concentration/MIC rat
ios for sparfloxacin were associated with clinical and bacteriologic effica
cy, whereas lower ratios were associated with clinical and bacteriologic fa
ilure. The clinical efficacy of sparfloxacin (80% to 95%) was comparable to
that obtained with the comparator drugs (71% to 92%). In addition, sparflo
xacin was well tolerated and had an overall frequency of related adverse ev
ents similar to that of the comparators. There was a higher frequency of ph
otosensitivity reactions but a lower level of digestive adverse events with
sparfloxacin compared with comparators. Sparfloxacin is a suit able therap
eutic alternative for the empiric treatment of respiratory tract infections
owing to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and activity against typica
l and atypical respiratory tract pathogens, even in geographic areas with a
high incidence of penicillin resistance.