Comparison of the in vitro activity of and pathogen responses to sparfloxacin with those of other agents in the treatment of respiratory tract, urinary tract, and skin and skin-structure infections

Citation
M. Dowzicky et al., Comparison of the in vitro activity of and pathogen responses to sparfloxacin with those of other agents in the treatment of respiratory tract, urinary tract, and skin and skin-structure infections, CLIN THER, 21(5), 1999, pp. 790-805
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
01492918 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
790 - 805
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-2918(199905)21:5<790:COTIVA>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
The in vitro activity of and pathogen responses to sparfloxacin were compar ed with those of standard therapies for the treatment of patients with comm unity-acquired pneumonia, complicated skin or skin-structure infections, ur inary tract infections, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis , and acute maxillary sinusitis in 7 multicenter controlled trials in North America. Sparfloxacin was administered orally as a 400-mg loading dose fol lowed by 200 mg once daily for up to 10 days. The bacteriologic efficacy of sparfloxacin (84% to 95%) was comparable to that of comparator drugs (77% to 100%). Sparfloxacin was generally 2 to 8 times more active (minimum inhi bitory concentration for 90% of strains tested [MIC90]: 0.03 to 0.5 mu g/mL ) than comparators against common pathogens isolated in community-acquired infections, especially Streptococcus pneumoniae, including penicillin-resis tant strains; Moraxella catarrhalis; Haemophilus influenzae; Streptococcus pyogenes; and Staphylococcus aureus. Sparfloxacin was also effective agains t Chlamydia and Mycoplasma species. The emergence of resistance was uncommo n during sparfloxacin therapy (0.3% of 1100 cases). Higher area under the p lasma concentration-time curve/MIC and maximum plasma concentration/MIC rat ios for sparfloxacin were associated with clinical and bacteriologic effica cy, whereas lower ratios were associated with clinical and bacteriologic fa ilure. The clinical efficacy of sparfloxacin (80% to 95%) was comparable to that obtained with the comparator drugs (71% to 92%). In addition, sparflo xacin was well tolerated and had an overall frequency of related adverse ev ents similar to that of the comparators. There was a higher frequency of ph otosensitivity reactions but a lower level of digestive adverse events with sparfloxacin compared with comparators. Sparfloxacin is a suit able therap eutic alternative for the empiric treatment of respiratory tract infections owing to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and activity against typica l and atypical respiratory tract pathogens, even in geographic areas with a high incidence of penicillin resistance.