Effect of single ascending, supratherapeutic doses of sparfloxacin on cardiac repolarization (QT(c) interval)

Citation
J. Morganroth et al., Effect of single ascending, supratherapeutic doses of sparfloxacin on cardiac repolarization (QT(c) interval), CLIN THER, 21(5), 1999, pp. 818-828
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
01492918 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
818 - 828
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-2918(199905)21:5<818:EOSASD>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
This double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in h ealthy adult male and female volunteers with no clinically relevant baselin e electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities to assess the cardiac tolerabili ty margin of sparfloxacin (as measured by the effect on QT(c) interval) und er conditions of potential overdose at up to 4 times the usual therapeutic loading dose. The 23 enrolled volunteers received a sequence of single dose s of sparfloxacin (400,800, 1200, and 1600 mg), I dose in each of 4 study p eriods. Six volunteers received placebo during each period. A 14-day washou t separated the periods. Serial blood samples and ECG measurements were col lected in each period to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of sparfloxacin. The area under the concentration-time curv e from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) exhibited dose proportionali ty. The maximum plasma concentration (C-max) after the 1200- and 1600-mg do ses was lower than would be expected for a linear dose relationship. This w as also the case with the mean increase and mean maximum increase in QT(c) interval. Increases in the QT(c) interval correlated well with C-max but no t with AUC(0-infinity). The time to reach C-max showed a slight tendency to increase with dose, as did the terminal elimination half-life. Changes in QT(c) interval dispersion were similar for both placebo recipients and spar floxacin-treated volunteers and were of no clinical consequence. At suprath erapeutic doses, the extent of sparfloxacin's absorption (AUC(0-infinity)) was dose independent; however, the rate of absorption was dose dependent, w ith C-max increasing substantially less than proportionally to the administ ered dose. This limited the C-max of sparfloxacin at supratherapeutic doses and thus the increase in QT, interval. Rechallenge demonstrated that only 2 of 8 subjects had the same degree of QT(c)-interval prolongation, emphasi zing the marked variability in the QT(c) interval.