A fundamental shift in the approach to international health by WHO, UNICEF, and the World Bank: Instances of the practice of "intellectual fascism" and totalitarianism in some Asian countries
D. Banerji, A fundamental shift in the approach to international health by WHO, UNICEF, and the World Bank: Instances of the practice of "intellectual fascism" and totalitarianism in some Asian countries, INT J HE SE, 29(2), 1999, pp. 227-259
Navarro has used the term "intellectual fascism" to depict the intellectual
situation in the McCarthy era. Intellectual fascism is now more malignant
in the poor countries of the world. The Indian Subcontinent, China, and som
e other Asian countries provide the context. The struggles of the working c
lass culminated in the Alma-Ata Declaration of self-reliance in health by t
he peoples of the world. To protect their commercial and political interest
s, retribution from the rich countries was sharp and swift, they "invented"
Selective Primary Health Care and used WHO, UNICEF, the World Bank, and ot
her agencies to let loose on poor countries a barrage of "international ini
tiatives" as global programs on immunization, AIDS, and tuberculosis. These
programs were astonishingly defective in concept, design, and implementati
on. The agencies refused to take note of such criticisms when they were pub
lished by others. They have been fascistic, ahistorical, grossly unscientif
ic, and Goebbelsian propagandists. The conscience keepers of public health
have mostly kept quiet.