The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of gap width on bone h
ealing around implants placed into simulated extraction socket defects of v
arying widths in 10 mongrel dogs. All premolars were removed and the alveol
ar ridges were reduced to a width of 7 mm. Nine weeks later, a total of 80
implants, 10 mm long by 3.3 mm wide, were placed into osteotomy sites prepa
red to 3 different diameters in the coronal half, simulating extraction soc
kets. Three experimental sites, with gap sizes of 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.4 m
m, were created; the control sites had no gap. The depth of each defect was
measured at the time of implant placement. All implants were stable at the
time of placement. The dogs were euthanized 12 weeks after implant placeme
nt, and blocks containing the implants and adjacent bone were submitted for
histologic evaluation. Clinically, all control and test sites healed, with
complete bone fill in the defect. Percentages of bone-to-implant contact w
ere measured histologically. As the gap widened, the amount of bone-to-impl
ant contact decreased, and the point of the highest bone-to-implant contact
shifted apically. These changes were statistically significant (P < .001).
No statistically significant differences in bone-to-implant contact were f
ound between the sites when the apical 4 mm of implants were compared. With
in the limits of this study, the simulated extraction socket defects healed
clinically, with complete bone fill, regardless of the initial gap size. H
owever, the width of the gap at the time of implant placement had a signifi
cant impact on the histologic percentage and the height of bone-to-implant
contact.