Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: A study in dogs

Citation
K. Akimoto et al., Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: A study in dogs, INT J O M I, 14(3), 1999, pp. 351-360
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
ISSN journal
08822786 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
351 - 360
Database
ISI
SICI code
0882-2786(199905/06)14:3<351:EOTIPI>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of gap width on bone h ealing around implants placed into simulated extraction socket defects of v arying widths in 10 mongrel dogs. All premolars were removed and the alveol ar ridges were reduced to a width of 7 mm. Nine weeks later, a total of 80 implants, 10 mm long by 3.3 mm wide, were placed into osteotomy sites prepa red to 3 different diameters in the coronal half, simulating extraction soc kets. Three experimental sites, with gap sizes of 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.4 m m, were created; the control sites had no gap. The depth of each defect was measured at the time of implant placement. All implants were stable at the time of placement. The dogs were euthanized 12 weeks after implant placeme nt, and blocks containing the implants and adjacent bone were submitted for histologic evaluation. Clinically, all control and test sites healed, with complete bone fill in the defect. Percentages of bone-to-implant contact w ere measured histologically. As the gap widened, the amount of bone-to-impl ant contact decreased, and the point of the highest bone-to-implant contact shifted apically. These changes were statistically significant (P < .001). No statistically significant differences in bone-to-implant contact were f ound between the sites when the apical 4 mm of implants were compared. With in the limits of this study, the simulated extraction socket defects healed clinically, with complete bone fill, regardless of the initial gap size. H owever, the width of the gap at the time of implant placement had a signifi cant impact on the histologic percentage and the height of bone-to-implant contact.