Educational and career outcomes of an internal medicine preceptorship for first-year medical students

Citation
Dm. Elnicki et al., Educational and career outcomes of an internal medicine preceptorship for first-year medical students, J GEN INT M, 14(6), 1999, pp. 341-346
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
08848734 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
341 - 346
Database
ISI
SICI code
0884-8734(199906)14:6<341:EACOOA>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Medical educators have attempted in recent years to provide quali ty clinical experiences for medical students early in their medical trainin g. We questioned whether participating in a preceptorship in internal medic ine (PIM) resulted in better performances on subsequent clinical rotations and increased interest in internal medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four students have participated in the PIM to date, wit h control groups consisting of students who applied for it but were not sel ected (n = 36), students participating in a preceptorship in family medicin e (n = 168), and the remaining students (n = 330). DESIGN:Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University medical center and community practices. INTERVENTION: A 2-month, clinical preceptorship following the first year of medical school. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The following outcomes were assessed: scores in the introduction to clinical medicine course; grades in the medical eth ics course; scores from the internal medicine clerkship; and choosing a car eer in internal medicine. In their second year, PIM students scored higher in both semesters of the introduction to clinical medicine course (87% and 86% vs 84% and 84%, p's < .01) and were more likely to receive honors in et hics (50% vs 29%, p < .01) than non-PIM students. During the internal medic ine clerkship, PIM students' scores were significantly higher on an objecti ve structured clinical examination (79% vs 76%, p = .05), ambulatory clinic al evaluations (80% vs 76%, p < .01), and overall clerkship scores (78% vs 75%, p = .03) but not on inpatient clinical evaluations or on the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examination. Preceptorship students were more likely to receive honors grades in the medicine clerkship (33% vs 10% , p < .01), and they were more likely to match into internal medicine resid encies than control students (54% vs 27%, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS:The PIM course is an intervention, early in students' careers, which appears to benefit them academically and increase their interest in i nternal medicine as a career.