This article analyses the surprising emergence of a comprehensive and coher
ent neo-liberal developmental model during the period of military rule in C
hile. Rather than reflecting a clear and definitive choice, the political p
rocess that produced this model was characterised by hesitation, policy con
tradiction, shifting priorities, and incremental choices. This was a result
of the military's efforts to deal with two, often conflicting, overarching
goals - economic and political stabilisation - as they evolved and were re
defined over time. The focus on incremental, iterated decision-making weave
s the insights of other explanations based in underlying institutional, coa
litional, or ideational factors into a micro-political explanation that is
consistent with the substantial variations in policy outcome across differe
nt phases of military rule.