Objective: The conventional management of patients with atrioventricular di
scordance is directed at associated lesions, taking advantage of physiologi
c "correction"; however, the morphologic right ventricle and tricuspid valv
e support the systemic circulation. Questions surrounding survival using th
is approach led us to analyze our institutional results. Methods: All patie
nts with atrioventricular discordance undergoing biventricular repair were
analyzed (n = 127, 1959-1997), excluding those with functionally univentric
ular hearts. The ventriculoarterial connection associated with atrioventric
ular discordance varied and was most commonly discordant (87%), but occasio
nally concordant (6%), double-outlet right ventricle (6%), or double-outlet
left ventricle (1%), At initial presentation, the most common lesions asso
ciated with atrioventricular discordance were ventricular septal defect (86
%), pulmonary stenosis (64%), tricuspid regurgitation (28%), and atrioventr
icular block (12%), Nine patients underwent a double switch procedure to cr
eate ventriculoarterial concordance and the remainder were managed conventi
onally without correcting discordant connections, Results: Operative mortal
ity was 6% and did not vary by associated lesion. Twenty years after repair
, survival was 48%, Within 20 years, 56% of patients required reoperation,
usually for atrioventricular valve incompetence (n = 16), pulmonary stenosi
s (n = 16), or both (n = 3), Pacemakers were required in 50 patients, 4 bef
ore repair, 40 within 2 months of repair, and 6 remotely after repair. In e
arly follow-up, the double switch procedure (n = 9) had equivalent mortalit
y and a high pacemaker requirement for atrioventricular block, Conclusions:
Analysis of conventional management of atrioventricular discordance reveal
ed cumulative increases in mortality, systemic atrioventricular valve (tric
uspid) replacement, complete atrioventricular block, and incidence of reope
ration. Alternative management should be examined.