Nd. Volkow et al., Methylphenidate and cocaine have a similar in vivo potency to block dopamine transporters in the human brain, LIFE SCI, 65(1), 1999, pp. PL7-PL12
The reinforcing effects of cocaine and methylphenidate have been linked to
their ability to block dopamine transporters (DAT). Though cocaine and meth
ylphenidate have similar in vitro affinities for DAT the abuse of methylphe
nidate in humans is substantially lower than of cocaine. To test if differe
nces in in vivo potency at the DAT between these two drugs could account fo
r the differences in their abuse liability we compared the levels of DAT oc
cupancies that we had previously reported separately for intravenous methyl
phenidate in controls and for intravenous cocaine in cocaine abusers. DAT o
ccupancies were measured with Positron Emission Tomography using [C-11]coca
ine, as a DAT ligand, in 8 normal controls for the methylphenidate study an
d in 17 active cocaine abusers for the cocaine study. The ratio of the dist
ribution volume of [C-11]cocaine in striatum to that in cerebellum, which c
orresponds to Bmax/Kd +1, was used as measure of DAT availability. Parallel
measures were obtained to assess the cardiovascular effects of these two d
rugs. Methylphenidate and cocaine produced comparable dose-dependent blocka
de of DAT with an estimated ED50 (dose required to block 50% of the DAT) fo
r methylphenidate of 0.07 mg/kg and for cocaine of 0.13 mg/kg. Both drugs i
nduced similar increases in heart rate and blood pressure but the duration
of the effects were significantly longer for methylphenidate than for cocai
ne. The similar in vivo potencies at the DAT for methylphenidate than for c
ocaine are in agreement with their reported relative in vitro affinities (K
i 390 nM and 640 nM respectively), which is likely to reflect the similar d
egree of uptake (8-10% of the injected dose) and regional distribution of t
hese two drags in the human brain. Thus, differences in the in vivo potency
of these two drugs at the DAT cannot be responsible for the differences in
their rate of abuse in humans. Other variables i.e. longer duration of met
hylphenidate's side effects may counterbalance its reinforcing effects. (C)
1999 Elsevier Science Inc.