BACKGROUND. Nursing home quality indicators (QIs) provide a way to support
quality assurance and improvement activities and to help ensure that cost s
avings are based on increased efficiency and not on decreased quality of ca
re.
OBJECTIVES. QIs values are expected to change over time. However, to be goo
d indicators of quality, they should be reasonably stable over "short" peri
ods. This paper discusses theoretical and measurement issues affecting stab
ility and examines the stability of QIs over each of two 3-month periods an
d one 6-month period.
SUBJECTS. The study sample included 512 nursing facilities from two states,
Kansas and South Dakota. QIs were measured for the first 3 quarters of 199
6.
MEASURES. Facility level QIs were constructed using three different metrics
that each provide a unique perspective of facility performance as follows:
the proportion of residents in the facility with the QI condition; the fac
ility's percentile rank in its state; and a variable indicating whether the
facility's rank exceeded the 90th percentile in its state. QI stability wa
s assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients, Spearman rank order corr
elation coefficients, and Cohen's Kappa, as appropriate for the metric.
RESULTS. Results indicated high levels of stability for most QIs, with lowe
r levels of stability found to be in keeping with theoretical and measureme
nt considerations.
CONCLUSIONS. QIs are reasonably stable over short periods of time. Quality
improvement efforts may best be focused on facilities that are consistently
poor performers over time, and those that show a large decrease in quality
from one quarter to the next.