The authors retrospectively reviewed 452 consecutively treated patient
s who underwent a spinal instrumentation procedure at a single institu
tion to establish which patients and which surgical approaches might b
e associated with an increased risk of developing deep wound infection
s and to determine the efficacy with which the institution's current t
reatment strategy eradicates these infections. Wound infections occurr
ed in 17 patients (10 men and seven women) with spinal instrumentation
(incidence 3.8%). All infections occurred after posterior spinal inst
rumentation procedures (7.2%); there were no infections after anterior
instrumentation procedures regardless of the level. Each patient was
assigned an infection risk factor (RF) score depending on the number o
f RFs identified in an individual patient preoperatively. The mean RF
score of patients who developed infections was 2.18, whereas the mean
RF score for a procedure-matched , infection-free control group was 0.
71. The mean number of days from surgery to clinical presentation was
27.6 days (range 4-120 days), and the mean increase in hospitalization
time for the subset of patients who developed infections was 16.6 day
s. The most common organism isolated from wound cultures was Staphyloc
occus aureus (nine of 17 cases). Of the 17 patients, five had infectio
ns involving multiple organisms. All patients were infection free at a
minimum of 8 months follow-up review. The current treatment regimen a
dvocated at this institution consists of operative debridement of the
infected wound, a course of intravenous followed by oral antibiotic me
dications, insertion of an antibiotic-containing irrigation-suction sy
stem for a mean of 5 days, and maintenance of the instrumentation syst
em within the infected wound.