N. Watanabe et al., In vitro and in vivo comparison of binding of 99m-Tc-labeled anti-CEA MAb F33-104 with 99m-Tc-labeled anti-CEA MAb BW431/26, NUKLEARMED, 38(4), 1999, pp. 115-119
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the potential for radioimmunod
etection (RAID) of murine anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monoclonal an
tibody (MAb) F33-104 labeled with technetium-gsm (99m-Tc) by a reduction-me
diated labeling method. Methods: The binding capacity of 99m-Tc-labeled ant
i-CEA MAb F33-104 with CEA by means of in vitro procedures such as immunora
diometric assay and cell binding assay and the biodistribution of 99m-Tc-la
beled anti-CEA MAb F33-104 in normal nude mice and nude mice bearing human
colon adenocarcinoma LS180 tumor were investigated and compared with 9gm-Tc
-labeled anti-CEA MAb BW431/26. Results: The in vitro binding rate of 99m-T
c-labeled anti-CEA MAb F33-104 with CEA in solution and attached to the cel
l membrane was significantly higher than 99m-Tc-labeled anti-CEA MAb BW431/
261 (31.4 +/- 0.95% vs. 11.9 +/- 0.55% at 100 ng/mL of soluble CEA, 83.5 +/
- 2.84% vs. 54.0 +/- 2.54% at 10(7) of LS 180 cells). In vivo, accumulation
of 99m-Tc-labeled anti-CEA MAb F33-104 was higher at 18 h postinjection th
an 99m-Tc-labeled anti-CEA MAb BW431/26 (20.1 +/- 3.50% ID/g vs. 14.4 +/- 3
.30% ID/g). 99m-Tc-activity in the kidneys of nude mice bearing tumor was h
igher at 18 h postinjection than at 3 h (12.8 +/- 2.10% ID/g vs. 8.01 +/- 2
.40% ID/g of 99m-Tc-labeled anti-CEA MAb F33-104, 10.7 +/- 1.70% ID/g vs. 8
.10 +/- 1.75% ID/g of 99m-Tc-labeled anti-CEA MAb BW431/26). Conclusion: 99
m-Tc-labeled anti-CEA MAb F33-104 is a potential novel agent for RAID of re
current colorectal cancer.