Editors' note: An important measure of good nutrition policy or any public
policy is the extent to which that policy is based on solid evidence from t
he biologic or social sciences. Another measure is the quality of the proce
ss and outcomes with regard to the issues of health and well-being for whic
h the policy was initiated. Professionals who work in nutrition programs as
well as other social service programs have fended to be at least ambivalen
t when confronted with terms such as "monitoring" and "evaluation. " But th
ere has been a growing realization that these techniques are essential to o
ur judgments about not only the effectiveness of a program but also the tas
k of ongoing project improvement. Clearly, then, a mastery of the concepts
and techniques of monitoring and evaluation will be necessary for improving
outcomes and for efficient use of resources when these techniques are tail
ored to fit the specific needs of a project.
This paper is adapted, with permission, from a World Bank guidebook on moni
toring and evaluation.* The authors were selected based on their own extens
ive experience in the field and their research on project monitoring and ev
aluation. We are pleased to present their definitions and technical suggest
ions to our readership, many of whom are involved in nutrition program plan
ning and evaluation.