The authors examined ought, ideal, and feared self-discrepancies as predict
ors of agitation- and dejection-related affects. Overall, discrepancy from
feared selves predicted anxiety and guilt, preempting the role of discrepan
cies from ought selves; ideal and feared discrepancies both predicted depre
ssion. Further analyses revealed interactions between actual-ought and actu
al-feared discrepancies in predicting anxiety and guilt. Among participants
who were relatively near their feared selves, discrepancies from ought sel
ves were unrelated to these affects. In contrast, among those whose feared
selves were more distant, ought discrepancies did predict agitation-related
affect, consistent with self-discrepancy theory. Discussion centers on a v
iew in which an avoidance motive (feared self) dominates anxiety and guilt
if the feared element is nearby but in which an associated approach motive
(ought self) dominates anxiety and guilt if the feared element is more remo
te.