I analyze the effect of procedural rules that permit judges to limit pretri
al discovery. In the presence of asymmetric information, a litigant may for
go settlement before discovery if his opponent interprets a serious offer a
s a sign that her discovery is likely to uncover useful evidence, leading h
er to invest more in discovery. Furthermore, a litigant may forgo settlemen
t in order to strengthen his or her threat of future discovery. I show that
by limiting pretrial discovery, the judge can simultaneously increase the
probability of early settlement and reduce expected litigation costs, witho
ut reducing potential injurers' incentives to take care.