Alongside neo-classical supply-side analysis, there was the emergence in th
e 1980s of a new strand of anlysis seeking to develop a social-institutiona
l perspective on the supply-side of modern industrial economies. This paper
contrasts the views of labor market "flexibility" provided by neo-classica
l analyses and supporters of deregulation with those of the Flexible Specia
lization and Diversified Quality Production theorists and assesses the stre
ngths and weaknesses of Flexible Specialization in comparison to its main "
institutionalist" rival. It concludes that the anlysis of "supply-side inst
itutionalism" and the evidence provided by important empirically based stud
ies, suggests that public policy directed towards: optimizing job training,
promoting employee participation and inter-firm co-operation, and restrict
ing the ability of firms to indulge in short-termism will be most productiv
e in promoting the cause of socially progressive industrial production and
"good work".