Planning theory: Democracy or sustainable development? - Both (but don't bother about the bread, please)

Authors
Citation
E. Holden, Planning theory: Democracy or sustainable development? - Both (but don't bother about the bread, please), SC HOUS PL, 15(4), 1998, pp. 227-247
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
SCANDINAVIAN HOUSING & PLANNING RESEARCH
ISSN journal
02815737 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
227 - 247
Database
ISI
SICI code
0281-5737(1998)15:4<227:PTDOSD>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
In this article I raise the question of how various planning theories relat e to the two normative conceptual systems of democracy and sustainable deve lopment. The issue under consideration is to what extent various normative planning theories on their own or in combination most satisfactorily can re concile the requirements of a sustainable development with the implications of democracy. Such an assessment is based on the fact that democracy impli es characteristic features such as participation, dialogue, communication, and consensus development. On the other hand, sustainable development deman ds protection of the interests of the world's poor, of future generations a nd of other species, as well as prompt and effective action. Through an analysis of synoptic planning, incremental planning, equity plan ning, and democratic planning, I shall argue that a combination of synoptic and equity planning is best suited to take democratic rules into account, as well as forming the basis for planning in a more sustainable direction.