The practical applicability and the relevance of a classification of proces
ses into three different regimes is examined based on some typical TMDSC ex
periments. It is demonstrated that this classification, simply based on the
presence and temperature susceptibility of an excess process, is very usef
ul to identify and understand phenomena observed with TMDSC.
The ability to separate the base-line heat capacity from excess phenomena i
s undoubtedly the most valuable feature of TMDSC. Nonetheless, one has to r
ealize that this feature is restricted to excess processes that are not sus
ceptible to the temperature modulation such as for instance curing and enth
alpy recovery. Crystallization and melting processes, on the other hand, ar
e susceptible to the temperature modulation and thus the complex heat capac
ity is in that case not uniquely determined by the base-line heat capacity.
In addition, the strong temperature dependence of the kinetics in combinat
ion with the generally large heat flow, imply that the conditions applied a
re very critical to obtain a reliable complex heat capacity. In spite of th
ese serious limitations it is demonstrated that TMDSC can provide additiona
l insight in the crystallization and melting behaviour using (step-wise) qu
asi-isothermal measurements (i.e. beta(0)=0) (C) 1994 Published by Elsevier
Science B.V. All rights reserved.