Prognostic value of histopathological grading in canine extramedullary plasmacytomas

Citation
Sj. Platz et al., Prognostic value of histopathological grading in canine extramedullary plasmacytomas, VET PATH, 36(1), 1999, pp. 23-27
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
VETERINARY PATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
03009858 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
23 - 27
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-9858(199901)36:1<23:PVOHGI>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The canine extramedullary plasmacytoma (cEMP) has recently been the subject of numerous investigations, indicating that the histomorphologic diagnosis is often difficult because of the variety of morphologic features. Therefo re, the objective of this study was to establish a subclassification scheme for cEMPs and to evaluate correlations between the types and malignancy. R etrospectively, 117 cEMPs, all immunohistochemically characterized by a mon oclonal immunoglobulin light-chain expression, were collected and assigned to morphologic types. These types were compared using data from a follow-up study on metastasis and tumor recurrence, then compared by proliferation r ate, determined by immunohistochemical detection of the antigen Ki-67. Hist opathologic typing revealed five different types of cEMPs, ranging from the mature type with typical plasma cells to the polymorphous-blastic type. Be tween these two forms, three additional types were established: hyaline, cl eaved, and asynchronous. Most of the cEMPs were of the cleaved and asynchro nous types. In all cEMPs, mononuclear and multinuclear giant cells were pre sent to varying degrees. Although the results of cell proliferation and the follow-up study indicated less benign behavior by the polymorphous-blastic type, the proliferation rate revealed no statistically significant differe nces among the cEMP types. The clinical data therefore confirmed previous f indings that the risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis in general can be classed as low. The established cEMP typing system is probably a very helpf ul diagnostic tool, although the types cannot be used for a tumor grading s ystem.