Sociological explanations of group conflict usually presuppose that the var
ious factors that breed hostility between collectivities also generate inte
rnal solidarity. Outside of the protest literature, studies of conflict the
refore pay little attention to the collective-action problem facing groups
in contention, and therefore overestimate the likelihood of group conflict:
intergroup struggle is implicitly regarded as a sufficient condition for g
roup participation in violent conflict. Examination of nineteenth-century c
ourt documents from Corsica, a society known for its tradition of collectiv
ist feuding, shows that violent incidents typically did not involve groups.
The group character of violence-in the form of collaborative use of lethal
force and inclusion of disputants' kin-was conditional on collective conte
ntion having occurred before violence began. This and other empirical patte
rns support the view that collective violence occurs,then group action fail
s to convince an adversary to back down. The failure to prevent escalation
calls the group's solidarity into question, compelling members to demonstra
te that they are able to overcome their collective-action problem.