Ideomotor apraxia, disordered movement execution to command, commonly
follows left-hemisphere damage, implying left-hemisphere dominance for
certain kinds of movements. To delineate this dominance we used diffe
rent command modalities to elicit meaningful movements and tested imit
ation of nonsense movements. Twenty-seven patients with unilateral hem
ispheric stroke and 10 age-matched controls were evaluated. Patients w
ith left-hemisphere damage performed both meaningful and nonsense move
ments poorer than the other study groups; thus, the meaningfulness of
the movements is irrelevant for the left-hemisphere motor dominance. T
he performance varied, however, with the command modality and movement
type. Based on this and earlier studies we posit that the left-hemisp
here motor dominance is determined by the artificiality of the test si
tuation (it concerns movements performed to command and out of the nat
ural context) and increased spatial and temporal complexity of the dem
anded movements. No association between the lesion locus within the le
ft hemisphere and the severity of the ideomotor apraxia was found. (C)
1997 Academic Press.