Objective. The present study investigated covert and overt attributional st
yles in individuals experiencing a first episode of psychosis. It was hypot
hesized that those individuals experiencing paranoia, as operationalized by
higher scores on the suspiciousness item of the Brief Psychiatric Rating S
cale (BPRS) would perform differently on both covert and overt measures of
attributional style when compared to those individuals who scored lower on
the BPRS suspiciousness item.
Design and Methods. A cross-sectional design was used. The sample consisted
of 62 participants (50 males and 12 females) from the Early Psychosis Prev
ention and Intervention Centre. The Pragmatic Inference Task (PIT) was used
to measure covert attributional style, whereas the Attributional Style Que
stionnaire (parallel form; ASQpf) measured overt attributional style. The R
osenberg Self-Esteem Questionnaire measured global self-esteem. Participant
s' positive, negative, and depressive symptoms were assessed by means of th
e BPRS, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and the Beck Dep
ression Inventory, respectively.
Results. Regression analyses found that less suspiciousness (P =.02) and mo
re depression (P =.02) predicted higher internal attributions for negative
events scores on the ASQpf. There was a trend (P =.07) for more suspicious
individuals to endorse the self-serving bias (SSB) on the PIT, even despite
the SSB not being large enough to be considered defensive. Verbal IQ emerg
ed as a significant predictor of covert attributional style (P =.04).
Conclusions. The findings suggest that increasing suspiciousness does predi
ct attributional style in the early stages of psychosis, although the relat
ionship appears weaker than in reports with more chronic psychotic patient
samples. Longitudinal research is needed to ascertain whether attributional
style is a stable characteristic in psychosis, or whether it fluctuates be
tween periods of remission and active psychosis.