In my comments on Gilster's article, I make the nexus between theory a
nd practice my focus, examining risk measurement and risk management o
n one hand and return calculations on the other. Gilster's point is ta
ngled in a thicket compounded of instrument risk, position risk, and p
ortfolio risk measures. In a real world context, the unrealism of the
continuous time assumption and instability in the stock sensitivity of
a neutral hedge do not matter; e.g., the specialist's position has a
stable overall portfolio risk structure. Despite its promise, Gilster'
s paper does not make a material contribution to the advancement of op
tion theory or practice.