24 7-yr.-old children and 24 university-age adults practiced a ballist
ic aiming task under either low contextual interference (blocked pract
ice) or high contextual interference (random practice). All subjects p
erformed 90 acquisition trials, followed by 20 transfer trials and 15
retention trials. Similar to previous findings, the adults performed t
he acquisition trials better under blocked than under random condition
s, yet performed the retention and transfer tests better after random
than blocked practice. No differences in acquisition were found betwee
n blocked and random practice conditions for the children; nevertheles
s, the random group performed the retention and transfer tests better
than the blocked group. The results are discussed in relation to appli
ed and theoretical issues of contextual interference.