Fish mercury distribution in Massachusetts, USA lakes

Citation
J. Rose et al., Fish mercury distribution in Massachusetts, USA lakes, ENV TOX CH, 18(7), 1999, pp. 1370-1379
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
07307268 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1370 - 1379
Database
ISI
SICI code
0730-7268(199907)18:7<1370:FMDIMU>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The sediment, water, and three species of fish from 24 of Massachusetts' (r elatively) least-impacted water bodies were sampled to determine the patter ns of variation in edible tissue mercury concentrations and the relationshi ps of these patterns to characteristics of the water, sediment, and water b odies (lake, wetland, and watershed areas). Sampling was apportioned among three different ecological subregions and among lakes of differing trophic status. We sought to partition the variance to discover if these broadly de fined concepts are suitable predictors of mercury levels in fish. Average m uscle mercury concentrations were 0.15 mg/kg wet weight in the bottom-feedi ng brown bullheads (Ameriurus nebulosus) (range = 0.01-0.79 mg/kg); 0.31 mg /kg in the omnivorous yellow perch (Perca flavescens) (range = 0.01-0.75 mg /kg); and 0.39 mg/kg in the predaceous largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoid es) (range = 0.05-1.1 mg/kg). Statistically significant differences in fish mercury concentrations between ecological subregions in Massachusetts, USA , existed only in yellow perch. The productivity level of the lakes (as ded uced from Carlson's Trophic Status Index) was not a strong predictor of tis sue mercury concentrations in any species. pH was a highly (inversely) corr elated environmental variable with yellow perch and brown bullhead tissue m ercury. Largemouth bass tissue mercury concentrations were most highly corr elated with the weight of the fish (+), lake size (+), and source area size s (+). Properties of individual lakes appear more important for determining fish tissue mercury concentrations than do small scale ecoregional differe nces. Species that show major mercury variation with size or trophic level may not be good choices for use in evaluating the importance of environment al variables.