Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population-level effects in ecotoxicology?

Citation
Ve. Forbes et P. Calow, Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population-level effects in ecotoxicology?, ENV TOX CH, 18(7), 1999, pp. 1544-1556
Citations number
58
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
07307268 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1544 - 1556
Database
ISI
SICI code
0730-7268(199907)18:7<1544:ITPCRO>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
In this paper we consider the relationships between effects of toxicants on population growth rate (r) and the individual-level traits (survival and r eproduction) contributing to it by examining population dynamics theory and by reviewing the experimental work that has been carried out in this conte xt. There was no consistent pattern in terms of which individual-level trai ts were most or least sensitive to toxicant exposure, and it is therefore i mpractical to select traits for ecotoxicological testing on this basis. Alt hough percent changes in several of the individual-level traits showed sign ificant overall correlations with percent changes in r, changes in any sing le trait could explain no more than about one-half of the percent change in r. Our conclusion is that r is a better measure of responses to toxicants than are individual-level effects, because it integrates potentially comple x interactions among life-history traits and provides a more relevant measu re of ecological impact.