Comparative open, randomized, cross-over bioequivalence study of two intravenous dexrazoxane formulations (Cardioxane (R) and ICRF-187) in patients with advanced breast cancer, treated with 5-fluorouracil-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (FDC)
H. Rosing et al., Comparative open, randomized, cross-over bioequivalence study of two intravenous dexrazoxane formulations (Cardioxane (R) and ICRF-187) in patients with advanced breast cancer, treated with 5-fluorouracil-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (FDC), EUR J DRUG, 24(1), 1999, pp. 69-77
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DRUG METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS
The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic disposition of
two intravenous dexrazoxane formulations, and their effects on doxorubicin
's kinetics and metabolism. Plasma concentration versus time curves and pha
rmacokinetic parameters of dexrazoxane given as Cardioxane(R) (dexrazoxane
hydrochloride salt) and ICRF-187 reference formulation (dexrazoxane base) w
ere determined and compared. Both formulations were administered as a singl
e intravenous infusion prior to 5-fluorouracil-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide
administration. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and its m
etabolites were studied after dexrazoxane administration.
A total of 15 patients with advanced breast cancer participated in this ope
n, randomized, cross-over study and 12 patients were evaluable. Plasma conc
entrations of dexrazoxane, doxorubicin and doxorubicin metabolites were det
ermined by high-performance liquid chromatography in samples obtained in th
e 72 h after drug administration. No statistically significant differences
were found in the tested kinetic parameters when the two products were comp
ared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) on log-transformed data. Cardioxane(R)
fulfilled the bioequivalence criteria when compared with ICRF-187 referenc
e formulation for all of the investigated parameters (AUC, t(1/2 beta), V-d
ss, Cl-tot, Cl-ren). The parametric 90% confidence intervals were contained
within the bioequivalence interval (0.8-1.25). Pharmacokinetic parameters
and metabolism of doxorubicin were not different after the administration o
f either Cardioxane(R) or ICRF-187 formulation. From the results of this st
udy it can be concluded that the two formulations can be considered bioequi
valent with regard to extent of absorption (AUC and V-dss) and elimination
(t(1/2 beta), and Cl-ren).