Evaluation of fetal echogenic bowel in the second trimester

Citation
Y. Yaron et al., Evaluation of fetal echogenic bowel in the second trimester, FETAL DIAGN, 14(3), 1999, pp. 176-180
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY
ISSN journal
10153837 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
176 - 180
Database
ISI
SICI code
1015-3837(199905/06)14:3<176:EOFEBI>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Previous studies cite different possible etiologies for fetal echogenic bow el (FEB). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possible etiologies for second-trimester FEB, and to provide clinical guidelines for evaluatio n of this finding. The study included 79 patients diagnosed with FEB in the second trimester. Fifteen cases (19%) were associated with maternal vagina l bleeding. Of these, 12 patients underwent amniocentesis, 9 of which had v isible blood products in the amniotic fluid. Seven cases (8.9%) had associa ted severe malformation. Seven other cases (8.9%) were noted in multifetal pregnancies. Five fetuses (6.3%) had evidence of bower obstruction or perfo ration not associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). Chromosomal aberrations we re found in 5 fetuses (6.3%). Intrauterine infection with cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, or parvovirus B-19 was docume nted in 5 patients (6.3%). Three cases (3.8%) were associated with subseque nt unexplained stillbirth. Two fetuses (2.5%) were found to be affected by CF. Finally, in 30 cases (38%), no obvious rea son for FEB was found. We co nclude that the evaluation of second-trimester FEB should include targeted ultrasound for associated malformations, infectious studies, DNA analysis f or CF mutations, amniocentesis for chromosomal analysis and evaluation of t he amniotic fluid for degraded blood products, and an autopsy in cases of s tillbirth. Even when no apparent reason is found, pregnancies should be con sidered at high risk for poor outcome.