A. Reichler et al., TRANSVAGINAL SONOGRAPHIC IMAGING OF EARLY 2ND-TRIMESTER FETAL ANATOMYASSISTED BY UTERINE FUNDAL PRESSURE, Obstetrics and gynecology, 89(6), 1997, pp. 949-952
Objective: To assess the advantage of applying uterine fundal pressure
to assist transvaginal sonographic imaging of early second-trimester
fetal anatomy. Methods: One hundred consecutive patients with singleto
n fetuses underwent routine transvaginal sonographic assessment of fet
al anatomy between 13 and 17 weeks' gestation. If the entire fetal ana
tomy including cardiac outflow tracts was not depicted, uterine fundal
pressure was applied with the operator's nonscanning hand in a bimanu
al fashion, to facilitate transvaginal imaging. Transabdominal sonogra
phy was performed when visualization of the entire fetal anatomy was n
ot obtainable with transvaginal or uterine fundal pressure-assisted tr
ansvaginal sonography. Observed fetal structures with and without fund
al pressure were compared. Factors assessed that may have modified the
value of fundal pressure included patient weight, gestational age, fe
tal presentation, previous abdominal surgery, and the presence of uter
ine fibroids. Statistical analysis included McNemar test, chi(2), Fish
er exact test, and t test, with P < .05 considered significant. Result
s: Visualization of lower limbs, head (including intracranial structur
es), upper limbs, kidneys, spine, gender, feet, hands (digits), face,
four-chamber view, and cardiac outflow tracts was significantly enhanc
ed by uterine fundal pressure-assisted versus nonassisted transvaginal
sonography. Uterine fundal pressure improved transvaginal sonographic
imaging in 91% of subjects, and in 51% of all subjects, a complete ex
amination was thus obtained. In 20% of all subjects, transabdominal so
nography was required to complete the examination. Complete fetal anat
omic scanning was unobtainable despite uterine fundal pressure supplem
ented by transabdominal sonography in 29% of cases. Completion of the
transvaginal sonographic fetal anatomic survey with uterine fundal pre
ssure was related to gestational age (P < .02) and maternal weight (P
< .05) yet not related to fetal presentation (P = .13), previous abdom
inal surgery (P = .06), or uterine fibroids (P = .26). Conclusion: Ute
rine fundal pressure applied during early second-trimester transvagina
l sonographic evaluation of fetal anatomy significantly improves visua
lization of fetal structures otherwise located beyond the effective ra
nge of the transvaginal transducer. (C) 1997 by The American College o
f Obstetricians and Gynecologists.