Quality control in health care: An experiment in radiotherapy planning forbreast cancer patients after mastectomy

Citation
K. Holli et al., Quality control in health care: An experiment in radiotherapy planning forbreast cancer patients after mastectomy, INT J RAD O, 44(4), 1999, pp. 827-833
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
ISSN journal
03603016 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
827 - 833
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(19990701)44:4<827:QCIHCA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Purpose: The importance of evaluating and improving quality in clinical pra ctice is now generally acknowledged. In this study we estimated different s ources of variation in radiotherapy planning for breast cancer patients aft er mastectomy and sought to test the applicability of a reproducibility and repeatability (R&R) study in a clinical context. Methods: Eleven radiation oncologists planned radiotherapy three times for three different kinds of breast cancer patients without knowing they were h andling the same patient three times. Variation was divided into different components: physicians as operators, patients as parts, and repeated measur ements as trials. Variation due to difference across trials (repeatability) , that across the physicians (reproducibility), and that across the patient s (variability) were estimated, as well as interactions between physicians and patients. Calculation was based on the sum of squares, and analysis was supported by various graphical presentations such as range charts and box plots. Results: Some parts of the planning process were characterized by higher an d different kinds of variation than the others. Interphysician variation (i .e., reproducibility) was not high but there were some clearly outlying phy sicians. The highest variation was in repeatability (= intraphysician varia tion). The major part of the variation was, however, that from patient to p atient: 33% of the total in Parameter 1 and 85% of the total in Parameter 2 , Conclusions: R&R studies are applicable and are needed to evaluate and impr ove quality in clinical practice. This kind of analysis provides opportunit ies to establish which kinds of patients require particularly careful atten tion, which points in the process are most critical for variation, which ar e the most difficult aspects for each physician and call for more careful d escription in documents, and which physicians need further training. (C) 19 99 Elsevier Science Inc.