The role of design as a means of differentiating products and services is i
ncreasing as it becomes difficult to sustain competitive advantage through
technology alone. Yet until recently there has been virtually no quantitati
ve information available relating to the contribution of design to business
performance, and there are only a few studies on performance measurement o
f design.
This paper, which is based on a review of the relevant literature, two case
studies and extensive discussions with design managers and consultants, hi
ghlights the need for a clear understanding of the pervasiveness of the des
ign activity that is being evaluated and an appreciation of the many dispar
ate roles that it plays from the idea generation stage through to developme
nt, packaging, market positioning and promotion. The span of design over a
product's life cycle, encompassing form (appearance), function (performance
) and fit (ergonomics), is just one reason why the design function may be l
ocated in R&D, manufacturing or marketing; this diffusion of the design act
ivity increases the difficulty of evaluation.
The research identified several factors that influence the balance between
quantitative and qualitative measures of design performance. The two projec
ts examined in this study revealed a strong top management preference for e
xante evaluation, and an ex-post emphasis on metrics for the performance of
the project and the cross-functional team responsible, rather than on sing
le disciplines within the team. The study also suggests that the complexity
and dynamics of the competitive environment in many industries requires ne
w conceptual models and a new, less linear, way of thinking about performan
ce measurement, in particular.