Attempts at understanding the urbanization process in Southeast Asia have,
in recent years, focused on the emergence of extended metropolitan regions
around primate cities. Many have argued that with a landscape of intensivel
y mixed 'rural' and 'urban' activities, such regions represent a distinctiv
e Asian form of urbanization and a challenge to the conventional urban-rura
l dualism. The implication, both in theoretical and policy terms, is that s
uch regions of mixed land use form new 'urban' landscapes that will persist
into the future on the basis of balanced 'agro-industrial' development. Dr
awing on fieldwork in a town on Manila's agricultural periphery, this paper
argues that such understandings present a static view of these regions, li
mited by macro-level data and analysis. A more ethnographic understanding o
f the social processes of 'everyday urbanization' at the interface of the '
urban' and the 'rural' dispels any sense of a stable rural-urban landscape
or balanced development. The evidence points to an incompatibility of funct
ions leading to the gradual 'squeezing out' of agriculture due to a changin
g economic calculus in agricultural households brought on by labour market
shifts; environmental conflicts between agricultural and urban-industrial a
ctivities; social and cultural transformations in rural society; a politica
l framework of bureaucratic corruption in the regulation of urbanization; a
nd the influence of personalized power relations in agi arian society.