This article proposes a new methodology for testing structural stability in
models estimated via generalized method of moments. Like most previous stu
dies of this general problem, attention is focused on the case in which som
e aspect of the model potentially changes at a single point in the sample,
known as the "breakpoint." Unlike this earlier work, however, our approach
is based on a decomposition of the null hypothesis into two components invo
lving parameter constancy and the validity of the overidentifying restricti
ons both before and after the suspected breakpoint. Using this framework, w
e propose a testing strategy that offers the potential to discriminate betw
een parameter variation and more general forms of instability. Statistics a
re presented for testing our null hypotheses in both the known and unknown
breakpoint cases. The tests are applied to the conditional capital asset pr
icing model used by Harvey to explain the international variation in stock
index returns. Harvey reported that data from five of the G7 countries sati
sfy the full-sample overidentifying restrictions of the model; our results
indicate that all five of these models exhibit structural instability and s
o are misspecified.