The myth of self-managing teams: A reflection on the allocation of responsibilities between individuals, teams and the organisation

Citation
J. De Leede et al., The myth of self-managing teams: A reflection on the allocation of responsibilities between individuals, teams and the organisation, J BUS ETHIC, 21(2-3), 1999, pp. 203-215
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Economics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
ISSN journal
01674544 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
2-3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
203 - 215
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-4544(199909)21:2-3<203:TMOSTA>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Concepts that include the participation and empowerment of workers are beco ming increasingly important nowadays. In many of these concepts, the formal responsibility is delegated to teams. Does this imply that the normative r esponsibility for the actions of teams is also delegated? In this article w e will reflect on the difference between holding a person accountable and b earing responsibility. A framework is elaborated in order to analyse the ac countability and responsibility of teams. In this framework, the emergence of a collective mind, and the organisational factors that influence the ext ent to which teams have the possibility of acting in a responsible way play an important role. It shows that teams can bear responsibilities that coul d never be carried by a group of individuals. The framework is used to anal yse two sample cases with self-managing teams in production facilities. The authors discuss the implications for the theory and practice of self-manag ing teams and the allocation of responsibility between individuals, teams a nd the organisation.