I. Constant et al., Assessment of short-term blood pressure variability in anesthetized children: A comparative study between intraarterial and finger blood pressure, J CLIN M C, 15(3), 1999, pp. 205-214
Objective. Continuous blood pressure (BP) measurement provides instantaneou
s information on hemodynamic status, and allows for assessment of sympathet
ic modulation of vasomotor tone using spectral analysis. As an alternative
to intraarterial blood pressure (IABP) measurement, the Finapres, a photopl
ethysmographic device, allows for non-invasive continuous measurement of fi
nger blood pressure (FBP). This study was designed to evaluate the accuracy
of spectral measurements of FBP variability in children during anesthesia
and recovery. For this purpose, reliability of BP measurement and short-ter
m BP variability assessed by FBP were calculated and compared with IABP. Me
thods. Finger blood pressure was compared with IABP from the ipsilateral ra
dial artery, in 14 children undergoing major surgery. Sixty-seven simultane
ous recordings of both signals were performed during anesthesia and 32 duri
ng recovery period. The accuracy of the FBP was determined by measuring its
bias and precision according to the Bland and Altman method. To assess the
ability of the FBP to follow short term BP variability, bias of total spec
tral power and bias of the 3 main spectral components (LF, MF, HF) were cal
culated. Transfer functions between invasive and non-invasive signals were
calculated. Results. The average bias of SBP measurement was 3.8 +/- 7.4 mm
Hg during anesthesia and 2.2 +/- 6.7 mmHg during recovery. During anesthesi
a overall variability and spectral components of FBP and IABP were similar
with both techniques; while during recovery, a selective amplification of t
he low frequencies (< 0.15 Hz) of FBP was observed. Frequency response anal
ysis of the pressure waveform, showed a high coherence between both signal
with a gain of 0.96 +/- 0.52 mmHg FBP/mmHg IABP under anesthesia, and of 0.
74 mmHg FBP/mmHg IABP during recovery. Conclusions. The differences evidenc
ed between FBP and IABP spectral profiles might result from specific physio
logical properties of digital arteries, which are sympathetic effectors. Th
is study supports the use of FBP in children to assess non-invasively the v
ascular sympathetic component of the autonomic nervous system during anesth
esia and recovery.