Objective. Intensive care and operating room monitors generate data that ar
e not fully utilized. False alarms are so frequent that attending personnel
tends to disconnect them. We developed an expert system that could select
and validate alarms by integration of seven vital signs monitored on-line f
rom cardiac surgical patients. Methods. The system uses fuzzy logic and is
able to work under incomplete or noisy information conditions. Patient stat
us is inferred every 2 seconds from the analysis and integration of the var
iables and a uni ed alarm message is displayed on the screen. The proposed
structure was implemented on a personal computer for simultaneous automatic
surveillance of up to 9 patients. The system was compared with standard mo
nitors (Space-Labs (TM) PC2), using their default alarm settings. Twenty pa
tients undergoing cardiac surgery were studied, while we ran our system and
the standard monitor simultaneously. The number of alarms triggered by eac
h system and their accuracy and relevance were compared. Two expert observe
rs (one physician, one engineer) ascertained each alarm reported by each sy
stem as true or false. Results. Seventy-five percent of the alarms reported
by the standard monitors were false, while less than 1% of those reported
by the expert system were false. Sensitivity of the standard monitors was 7
9% and sensitivity of the expert system was 92%. Positive predictive value
was 31% for the standard monitors and 97% for the expert system. Conclusion
s. Integration of information from several sources improved the reliability
of alarms and markedly decreased the frequency of false alarms. Fuzzy logi
c may become a powerful tool for integration of physiological data.