Engineering practice in trickling filter design has been influenced by the
propagation of myths as much as by the analysis of data and factual determi
nations. In this paper, several common myths encountered by the writer in h
is engineering practice are examined. The myths are tied to source(s) where
possible, and then the factual underpinnings (if any) are examined. Common
myths include the following: (1) Trickling filter processes are less relia
ble than activated sludge processes; (2) trickling filters are poor perform
ers in cold weather; (3) trickling filters are more expensive; (4) motorize
d distributor speed control is always needed; (5) cross-flow media should n
ot be used at total organic loadings exceeding 1.6 kg BOD5/m(3) . d and (6)
all media are created equal.