COMPARISON OF BIOTYPING, RIBOTYPING, AND PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS FOR INVESTIGATION OF A COMMON-SOURCE OUTBREAK OF BURKHOLDERIA-PICKETTII BACTEREMIA

Citation
H. Chetoui et al., COMPARISON OF BIOTYPING, RIBOTYPING, AND PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS FOR INVESTIGATION OF A COMMON-SOURCE OUTBREAK OF BURKHOLDERIA-PICKETTII BACTEREMIA, Journal of clinical microbiology, 35(6), 1997, pp. 1398-1403
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
ISSN journal
00951137
Volume
35
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1398 - 1403
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-1137(1997)35:6<1398:COBRAP>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Over a 3-month period, six immunocompromised patients developed one or more episodes of Burkholderia pickettii bacteremia and/or catheter in fection, Vials of a commercially available, ''sterile'' saline for inj ection which had been used for Bushing the patients' indwelling intrav enous devices were implicated as the common source of the organisms, N o further cases were diagnosed once the use of this saline was discont inued. Twenty six isolates, including 9 outbreak-related strains from case patients and contaminated saline as well as 17 control strains, w ere tested comparatively by biotyping, ribotyping with EcoRI and HindI II, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with SpeI. Macrorestri ction analysis revealed nine PFGE groups and was more discriminating t han ribotyping (seven ribotypes) and biotyping (two biovars), Among th e outbreak-related isolates, one B. pickettii type was found by the th ree typing methods, Furthermore, PFGE was useful for subdividing ribot ypes and for distinguishing isolates involved in the outbreak from all epidemiologically unrelated strains.