COMPARISON OF BIOTYPING, RIBOTYPING, AND PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS FOR INVESTIGATION OF A COMMON-SOURCE OUTBREAK OF BURKHOLDERIA-PICKETTII BACTEREMIA
H. Chetoui et al., COMPARISON OF BIOTYPING, RIBOTYPING, AND PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS FOR INVESTIGATION OF A COMMON-SOURCE OUTBREAK OF BURKHOLDERIA-PICKETTII BACTEREMIA, Journal of clinical microbiology, 35(6), 1997, pp. 1398-1403
Over a 3-month period, six immunocompromised patients developed one or
more episodes of Burkholderia pickettii bacteremia and/or catheter in
fection, Vials of a commercially available, ''sterile'' saline for inj
ection which had been used for Bushing the patients' indwelling intrav
enous devices were implicated as the common source of the organisms, N
o further cases were diagnosed once the use of this saline was discont
inued. Twenty six isolates, including 9 outbreak-related strains from
case patients and contaminated saline as well as 17 control strains, w
ere tested comparatively by biotyping, ribotyping with EcoRI and HindI
II, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with SpeI. Macrorestri
ction analysis revealed nine PFGE groups and was more discriminating t
han ribotyping (seven ribotypes) and biotyping (two biovars), Among th
e outbreak-related isolates, one B. pickettii type was found by the th
ree typing methods, Furthermore, PFGE was useful for subdividing ribot
ypes and for distinguishing isolates involved in the outbreak from all
epidemiologically unrelated strains.