EVALUATION OF 9 IMMUNOASSAY KITS (ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY AND DIRECT FLUORESCENCE) FOR DETECTION OF GIARDIA-LAMBLIA AND CRYPTOSPORIDIUM-PARVUM IN HUMAN FECAL SPECIMENS
Ls. Garcia et Ry. Shimizu, EVALUATION OF 9 IMMUNOASSAY KITS (ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY AND DIRECT FLUORESCENCE) FOR DETECTION OF GIARDIA-LAMBLIA AND CRYPTOSPORIDIUM-PARVUM IN HUMAN FECAL SPECIMENS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 35(6), 1997, pp. 1526-1529
It is well known that Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum can c
ause severe symptoms in humans, particularly those who are immunologic
ally compromised. Immunoassay procedures offer both increased sensitiv
ity and specificity compared to conventional staining methods. These r
eagents are also helpful when screening large numbers of patients, par
ticularly in an outbreak situation or when screening patients with min
imal symptoms. The data obtained by using 9 diagnostic kits were compa
red: direct fluorescent antibody assay (DFA) kits (TechLab Giardia/Cry
pto IF kit, TechLab Crypto IF kit, and Meridian Merifluor Cryptosporid
ium/Giardia) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits (Alexon ProSpecT Giardi
a EZ Microplate Assay, Alexon ProSpecT Cryptosporidium Microplate Assa
y Cambridge Giardia lamblia Antigen Microwell ELISA, Meridian Premier
Giardia lamblia, Meridian Premier Cryptosporidium, TechLab Giardia CEL
ISA, Trend Giardia lamblia EIA). The test with the Meridian Merifluor
Cryptosporidium/Giardia kit was used as the reference method. In vario
us combinations, 60 specimens positive for Giardia 60 specimens positi
ve for Cryptosporidium, 40 specimens positive for a Giardia-Cryptospor
idium mix, and 50 negative fecal specimens were tested. Different spec
ies (nine protozoa, three coccidia, one microsporidium, five nematodes
, three cestodes, and one trematode) were included in the negative spe
cimens. The sensitivity of ELA for Giardia ranged from 94% (Alexon) to
99% (Trend and Cambridge); the specificity was 100% with all EIA kits
tested. The sensitivity of EIA for Cryptosporidium ranged from 98% (A
lexon) to 99% (Meridian Premier); specificities were 100%. All DFA res
ults were in agreement, with 100% sensitivity and specificity; however
, the TechLab reagents resulted in fluorescence intensity that was gen
erally one level below that seen with the reagents used in the referen
ce method. In addition to sensitivity and specificity, factors such as
cost, simplicity, ease of interpretation of results (color, intensity
of fluorescence), equipment, available personnel, and number of tests
ordered are also important considerations prior to kit selection.