J. Petit et al., Testing the classification of static gamma axons using different patterns of random stimulation, J NEUROPHYS, 81(6), 1999, pp. 2823-2832
Testing the classification of static gamma axons using different patterns o
f random stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 2823-2832, 1999. The possibility
of using randomly generated stimulus intervals (with a Poisson distributio
n) to identify the type(s) of intrafusal fiber activated by the stimulation
of single static gamma axons was tested in Peroneus tertius muscle spindle
s of anesthetized cats. Three patterns of random stimulation with different
values of mean intervals [20 +/- 4.47, 30 +/- 8.94, and 40 +/- 8.94 (SD) m
s] were used. Single static gamma axons activating, in single spindles, eit
her the bag, fiber alone or the chain fibers alone or both types of intrafu
sal fiber were prepared. Responses of spindle primary endings elicited by t
he stimulation of gamma axone were recorded from Ia fibers in cut dorsal ro
ot filaments. Cross-correlograms between stimuli and spikes of the primary
ending responses, autocorrelograms: interval histograms of responses, and s
timulations were built. The characteristics of cross-correlograms were foun
d to be related not only to the type of intrafusal muscle fibers activated
but also to the parameters of the stimulation. Moreover some cross-correlog
rams with similar characteristics were produced by the activation of differ
ent intrafusal muscle fibers. It also was observed that, whatever the type
of intrafusal muscle fiber activated, cross-correlograms could exhibit osci
llations after an initial peak, provided the extent in frequency of the pri
mary ending response was small; these oscillations arise in part from the a
utocorrelation of the primary ending responses. Therefore, cross-correlogra
ms obtained during random stimulation of static gamma axons cannot be used
for unequivocally identifying the type(s) of intrafusal muscle fiber these
axons supply.