Propranolol in prevention of portal hypertensive hemorrhage in children: Apilot study

Citation
H. Shashidhar et al., Propranolol in prevention of portal hypertensive hemorrhage in children: Apilot study, J PED GASTR, 29(1), 1999, pp. 12-17
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION
ISSN journal
02772116 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
12 - 17
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-2116(199907)29:1<12:PIPOPH>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Background: Data regarding the use of propranolol in the prevention of port al hypertensive hemorrhage in pediatric patients are limited despite its wi despread use in adults with cirrhosis, The purpose of this study was to eva luate safety and efficacy of propranolol in the management of portal hypert ension in the pediatric population. Methods: Medical information was retrieved from the records of 21 children with portal hypertension who received propranolol either before or after an episode of gastrointestinal bleeding. Data collected included diagnosis, t ype of portal hypertension, age at initiation of therapy, bleeding episodes before and during propranolol therapy, degree of reduction of heart rate, adherence, and adverse effects. Results: Fourteen of 21 patients did not experience portal hypertensive ble eding while receiving propranolol. Of the seven patients who had bleeding e pisodes, two had failed to adhere to the medication regimen, and four were receiving doses of less than 1 mg/kg per day. Only one of the four patients who experienced bleeding before initiation of therapy also bled while rece iving propranolol and two of the three patients who had a heart rate reduct ion of less than 25% each experienced a bleeding episode. Side effects were minimal and did not necessitate discontinuation of therapy in any patient. Conclusions: Propranolol was well tolerated with minimal side effects in ou r patients with portal hypertension. Adherence and adequacy of dosage (>1 m g/kg per day, more than twice daily dose frequency) are important determina nts of efficacy. A reduction in heart rate of loss than 25% may be associat ed suboptimal efficacy.