Wk. Shen et al., Utility of a single-stage isoproterenol tilt table test in adults - A randomized comparison with passive head-up tilt, J AM COL C, 33(4), 1999, pp. 985-990
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
OBJECTIVES This study was conducted to develop a time-efficient tilt table
test.
BACKGROUND Current protocols of tilt table testing are quite time-consuming
. This study was designed to assess the diagnostic value, tolerance and pro
cedural time of a. single-stage isoproterenol tilt table protocol.
METHODS A single-stage isoproterenol tilt table test was compared with the
passive tilt table test. The study was prospectively designed in a randomiz
ed and crossover fashion.
RESULTS The study population consisted of 111 patients with a history of sy
ncope (mean age 55 +/- 20 years). Of the total, 62 patients (56%; 95% confi
dence interval, 46% to 65%) had a positive vasovagal response during isopro
terenol tilt table testing and 35 (32%; 23% to 41%) during passive tilt tab
le testing (p = 0.002). The mean procedural times of the study population w
ere 11.7 +/- 3.6 min and 36.9 +/- 13.3 min for isoproterenol and passive ti
lt table testing, respectively (p < 0.001). All patients tolerated single-s
tage isoproterenol testing. In the 23 control subjects (mean age 34 +/- 11
years), the apparent specificities were 91% (72% to 99%) and 83% (61% to 99
%) for passive and single-stage tilt table testing, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS The single-stage isoproterenol tilt table test was more effecti
ve in inducing a positive vasovagal response in an adult population than th
e standard passive tilt table test, and it significantly reduced the proced
ural time. The increase in positive yield was associated with a moderate de
crease in apparent specificity. These observations support the conclusion t
hat single-stage tilt table testing could be a reasonable diagnostic option
in patients undergoing syncope evaluation. (J Am Coil Cardiol 1999;33:985-
90) (C) 1999 by the American College of Cardiology.