M. Rodriguez et al., Parathyroid function as a determinant of the response to calcitriol treatment in the hemodialysis patient, KIDNEY INT, 56(1), 1999, pp. 306-317
Background. Bolus calcitriol (CTR) is used for the treatment of secondary h
yperparathyroidism in dialysis patients. Although CTR treatment reduces par
athyroid hormone (PTH) levels in many dialysis patients, a significant numb
er fail to respond.
Methods. To learn whether or not an analysis of parathyroid function could
further illuminate the response to CTR, a PTH-calcium curve was performed b
efore and after at least two months of CTR treatment in 50 hemodialysis pat
ients with a predialysis intact PTH of greater than 300 pg/ml.
Results. For the entire group (N = 50), CTR treatment resulted in a 24% red
uction in predialysis (basal) PTH from 773 +/- 54 to 583 +/- 71 pg/ml (P <
0.001), whereas ionized calcium increased from 1.10 +/- 0.02 to 1.22 +/- 0.
02 mM (P < 0.001): however, maximal and minimal PTH did not change from pre
-CTR values. Based on whether or not the basal PTH decreased by 40% or more
during CTR treatment, patients were divided into responders (Rs, N = 25) a
nd nonresponders (NRs, N = 25). Before CTR, the NR group was characterized
by a greater basal (959 +/- 80 vs. 586 +/- 51 pg/ml, P < 0.001) and maximal
(1899 +/- 170 vs. 1172 +/- 108 pg/ml, P < 0.001) PTH and serum phosphorus
(6.14 +/- 0.25 vs. 5.14 +/- 0.34 mg/dl, P < 0.01). Logistical regression an
alysis showed that the pre-CTR basal PTH was the most important predictor o
f the post-CTR basal PTH. and a pre-CTR basal PTH of 750 pg/ml represented
a 50% probability of a response. Basal PTH correlated with the ionized calc
ium in the NR group (r = 0.59, P = 0.002) but not in the R group (r = 0.06,
P = NS). In the R group, an inverse correlation was present between ionize
d calcium and the basal/maximal PTH ratio, an indicator of whether calcium
is suppressing basal PTH secretion relative to the maximal secretory capaci
ty (maximal PTH) r = -0.55, P = 0.004; in the NR group, this correlation ap
proached significance but was positive (r = 0.34, P = 0.09). After CTR trea
tment, serum calcium increased in both groups, and despite marked differenc
es in basal PTH (Rs, 197 +/- 25 vs. NRs, 969 +/- 85 pg/ml), an inverse corr
elation between ionized calcium and basal/maximal PTH was present in both g
roups (Rs, r = -0.61, P = 0.001, and NRs, r = -0.60, P = 0.001).
Conclusions. (a) Dynamic testing of parathyroid function provided insights
into the pathophysiology of PTH secretion in hemodialysis patients. (b) The
magnitude of hyperparathyroidism was the most important predictor of the r
esponse to CTR. (c) Before CTR treatment, PTH was sensitive to calcium in R
s, and serum calcium was PTH driven in NRs, and (d) after the CTR-induced i
ncrease in serum calcium, calcium suppressed basal PTH relative to maximal
PTH in both groups.