D. Garcia et al., Bird rejection of unhealthy fruits reinforces the mutualism between juniper and its avian dispersers, OIKOS, 85(3), 1999, pp. 536-544
We investigated fruit damage by insects as well as fruit abortion in relati
on to the mutualism between Juniperus communis, a fleshy-fruited. plant dom
inant in the high mountains of southeastern Spain, and its bird disperser a
ssemblage. For two years, we performed field experiments to analyse fruit s
election by birds, offering birds different types of anomalous fruits (unri
pe, aborted, pulp-sucker infested and seed-predator attacked) and comparing
the removal rate to that of ripe, healthy, control fruits. In addition, ne
studied the proportion of fruits attacked by the seed predator in samples
of fruits which, after manipulation and rejection by birds, we found lying
underneath plants. We compared these data to values in samples of fruits wh
ich we took directly From plants. Finally, over four years, the abundance o
f predispersal-depredated seeds in the seed rain dispersed by birds was com
pared with the abundance in seeds taken directly from plants. Fruit-choice
experiments showed that unripe, aborted and Fruits attacked by pest insects
(both pulp sucker and seed predator) were strongly counterselected by thes
e frugivorous birds. The proportion of fruits attacked by seed-predator in
the sample of fruits manipulated and rejected was significantly higher than
in the fruits taken from plants. For all study years, the proportion of de
predated seeds was significantly lower in the sample of seeds dispersed by
birds than in the sample of seeds taken from plants. Bird response to pests
was not categorically to accept or reject fruit, but rather was influenced
by pest density. Birds showed two different levels of fruit selection, dep
ending on the type of fruit: visual discrimination, against Fruits that are
unripe, aborted and infested by the pulp sucker: and within-beak discrimin
ation, against fruits attacked by the seed predator. In the study, both pes
ts either died or left the fruit when ripe, and therefore frugivorous birds
did not interfere directly with frugivorous insects. On the contrary, inse
cts did interfere indirectly with birds, promoting the rejection of pest-at
tacked fruits by birds. Bird dispersers overcame the predispersal interfere
nce of pest fruit damage and Fruit abortion and increased the proportion of
healthy seeds in the seed rain. This fact, together with the great quantit
y of seeds dispersed by birds, reinforces the importance of birds as plant
mutualists.