Mr. Haney et Jg. Evans, National survey of school psychologists regarding use of dynamic assessment and other nontraditional assessment techniques, PSYCHOL SCH, 36(4), 1999, pp. 295-304
A national survey investigating the use of dynamic assessment and other non
traditional assessment techniques among school psychologists (N = 226) was
conducted. Results of the survey indicated that 42% of respondents were at
least "somewhat familiar" with dynamic assessment. However, of those famili
ar with dynamic assessment, only 39% reported using the techniques once a y
ear or more. The most frequently endorsed reasons for not using dynamic ass
essment (if familiar with it) were lack of knowledge and time restraints. L
earning disabled students were the population of students most often evalua
ted using dynamic assessment and the dynamic assessment was most often used
to determine processing strengths and weaknesses. The majority of those fa
miliar with dynamic assessment became so through independent reading. Only
10% reported learning about dynamic assessment through course work. In resp
onse to questions regarding assessment techniques most often used with mino
rity students the majority of respondents reported using traditional assess
ment tools including the WISC-III (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children
-Third Edition), BINET IV (Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition
), or KABC (Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children). Overall, the results
of the survey suggest that although the population is becoming increasingly
more diverse and changes in PL94-142 (Public Law 94-142) demand functional
assessments, school psychologists continue to rely heavily upon traditiona
l assessment techniques to address referral concerns of all students. This
may in large part be due to weaknesses in graduate training programs. (C) 1
999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.